Opinion
2:18-cv-02162-MMD-DJA
04-13-2022
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP SCOTT E. GIZER SOPHIA S. LAU Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and Specially-Appearing Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP MICHAEL A. PINTAR Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and Specially-Appearing Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC. WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP DARREN T. BRENNER LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP SCOTT E. GIZER SOPHIA S. LAU Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and Specially-Appearing Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP MICHAEL A. PINTAR Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY and Specially-Appearing Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP DARREN T. BRENNER LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNTER-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (SECOND REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. 1
COMES NOW defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company and specially appearing defendant Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“Defendants”) on the one hand, and Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association (“Plaintiff”) on the other hand (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On March 4, 2022, defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint;
2. On March 9, 2022, specially appearing defendant Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. (“FNTG”) filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint.
3. On March 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Chicago Title's Motion to Dismiss and a Counter-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
4. Also on March 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed an Opposition to FNTG's Motion to Dismiss;
5. Defendants' deadline to file replies in support of their Motions to Dismiss is currently April 19, 2022;
6. Defendants request an extension of time to file replies in support of their Motions to Dismiss, through and including May 2, 2022, to afford Defendants' counsel additional time to respond to the legal arguments set forth in Plaintiff's Oppositions;
7. Defendants also request an extension of time to May 2, 2022, to oppose Plaintiff's Counter-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment;
8. Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extensions;
9. This is the second request for extensions which is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that:
1. Defendant Chicago Title's deadline to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is extended through and including May 2, 2022;2
2. Defendant Chicago Title's deadline to file an opposition to plaintiff's Counter Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is extended through and including May 2, 2022;and
3. Defendant FNTG's deadline to file a reply in support of its Motion to Dismiss is extended through and including May 2, 2022.
IT IS ORDERED. 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 13, 2022, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filling to the Electronic Service List for this Case.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United State of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 4