Opinion
2:18-cv-02162-MMD-DJA
10-11-2023
HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF DEUTSCHE ALT-A SECURITIES, INC., MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2007-OA3, a National Banking Association, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants.
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Sophia S. Lau, Esq., EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Michael A. Pintar Attorneys for Defendant CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
Sophia S. Lau, Esq.,
Attorneys for Defendant
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP
Darren T. Brenner, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Scott E. Gizer, Esq.,
Sophia S. Lau, Esq.,
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP
MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP
Michael A. Pintar
Attorneys for Defendant
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME FOR CHICAGO
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S
OPPOSITION TO CHICAGO TITLE'S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
SURREPLY TO HSBC'S MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Defendant Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Defendant”) on the one hand, and Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee for the Holders of Deutsche Alt-A Securities, Inc., Mortgage Loan Trust Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA3 (“Plaintiff') on the other hand (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, and hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On October 3, 2023, Defendant filed a Motion for Leave to File Surreply to HSBC's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 119] (“Motion for Surreply”).
2. On October 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed its Opposition to the Motion for Surreply [ECF No. 121] (“Opposition”).
3. The current deadline for Defendant to file its reply to Plaintiff's Opposition is October 11, 2023.
4. Defendant requests a two (2) day extension of its deadline to file its response to Plaintiff's Opposition, so that the new deadline is October 13, 2023. Defendant asserts this additional time is needed to to review and respond to the arguments in Plaintiff's Opposition.
5. Counsel for Plaintiff does not oppose the requested extension.
6. This is Defendant's first request for extension which Defendant represents is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.