From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hrusovsky v. Stowitzskyn

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-147 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-147.

December 17, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2008, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Robert Hrusovsky (Document No. 1), and the record in this case, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated November 24, 2008, no objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey dated November 24, 2008, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by petitioner, Robert Hrusovsky, is DISMISSED; and,

3. A certificate of appealability will not issue because reasonable jurists would not debatewhether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right or this Court's procedural rulings with respect to petitioner's claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).


Summaries of

Hrusovsky v. Stowitzskyn

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-147 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Hrusovsky v. Stowitzskyn

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HRUSOVSKY Petitioner, v. PAUL J. STOWITZSKYN and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 17, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-147 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 17, 2008)