From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hroch v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1963
20 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

December 30, 1963


In a negligence action by the infant plaintiff to recover damages for personal injury, and by her father to recover for medical expenses and loss of services, defendants Union News Company and Philip De Noia appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 17, 1963 after trial on the jury's verdict in favor of plaintiffs, as was against said defendants. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law and the facts; action severed as against the nonappealing defendant Colon; and a new trial granted as between plaintiffs and the said defendants, Union News Company and De Noia, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the finding, implicit in the verdict, that appellants' negligence was a proximate cause of the accident in which the infant plaintiff was injured, was against the weight of the credible evidence. Beldock, P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hroch v. Colon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1963
20 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Hroch v. Colon

Case Details

Full title:WILHELMINA HROCH, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, GEORGE HROCH, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1963

Citations

20 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)