Hrnjic v. Berryhill

1 Citing case

  1. Achille v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

    Civil Action 23-147-E (W.D. Pa. Apr. 26, 2024)

    Accordingly, the Court finds the ALJ's RFC finding is supported by substantial evidence. Plaintiff's argument that Hrnjic v. Berryhill, No. 1:16-302, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11607, at *12-14 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 24, 2018) demands a remand of her case is unconvincing. Hrnjic involved an ALJ's decision where the RFC determination was silent as to limitations caused by Plaintiff's non-severe mental impairments, whereas the ALJ here specifically analyzed Plaintiff's mental health and its impact on her ability to work, stating, “[Plaintiff's m]ental health treatment has also been limited and conservative, with a focus on improving communication in her family, and mental status examinations have typically been entirely normal, with no indication that a mental impairment more than minimally limits her ability to work.”