From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hranek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
327 So. 3d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1863

09-22-2021

Christopher J. HRANEK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Christopher J. Hranek, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Christopher J. Hranek, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court denies the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Ray, Jay, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hranek v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sep 22, 2021
327 So. 3d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Hranek v. State

Case Details

Full title:Christopher J. HRANEK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Sep 22, 2021

Citations

327 So. 3d 905 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)