From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HRABAR v. HOCK

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 6, 1949
5 N.J. Super. 162 (App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

Argued September 26, 1949 —

Decided October 6, 1949.

Appeal from Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage. Control

Before Judges McGEEHAN, COLIE and EASTWOOD.

Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Jacob L. Triarsi, attorney).

Mr. Anthony Meyer, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent, Hock.

Mr. Julius R. Pollatschek argued the cause for Union County Retail Liquor Stores Association.


This appeal is from an order of the Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control reversing the action of the Municipal Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control in granting "broad package privileges" to appellant.

So far as the legal questions involved are concerned, they do not differ from and are controlled by our decision in Coral Lounge and Cocktail Bar, Inc., v. Hock, 5 N.J. Super. 163 .

As to the factual situation, the so-called package department was separated from the barroom by a partition four feet or waist high which was insufficient, in the judgment of the Director, to make the package department "a portion of the licensed premises other than a public barroom." In that finding we concur.

The order under appeal is affirmed.


Summaries of

HRABAR v. HOCK

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 6, 1949
5 N.J. Super. 162 (App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

HRABAR v. HOCK

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HRABAR, TRADING AS THE ROOST, APPELLANT, v. ERWIN B. HOCK, DIRECTOR…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 6, 1949

Citations

5 N.J. Super. 162 (App. Div. 1949)
68 A.2d 562