From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.R. v. Dist. of Columbia

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jun 10, 2022
Civil Action 21-1856 (TJK/RMM) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-1856 (TJK/RMM)

06-10-2022

H.R. et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant.


ORDER

TIMOTHY J. KELLY United States District Judge.

On April 29, 2022, Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff's preliminary injunction motion. ECF No. 8. To date, no objections to the R&R have been filed, and the time to file such an objection has lapsed. Local Civil Rule 72.3(b); see also ECF No. 8 at 16 (noting that “any party who objects to the [R&R] . . . must file a written objection thereto within 14 days”). Thus, any objections are deemed waived. See, e.g., Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-55 (1985).

The Court, upon independent consideration of the R&R, the lack of any objection, the entire record, and the applicable law, agrees with the recommendations made in the R&R. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the R&R, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED in its entirety; it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. 4, is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

H.R. v. Dist. of Columbia

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Jun 10, 2022
Civil Action 21-1856 (TJK/RMM) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2022)
Case details for

H.R. v. Dist. of Columbia

Case Details

Full title:H.R. et al., Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Jun 10, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 21-1856 (TJK/RMM) (D.D.C. Jun. 10, 2022)