From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoyt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 27, 2002
810 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 4D01-3904.

February 27, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Paul B. Kanarek, Judge.

Jack Hoyt, Ft. Pierce, pro se.

Daniel S. McIntyre, St. Lucie County Attorney, and Katherine MacKenzie Smith, Assistant County Attorney, Ft. Pierce, for appellee.


We affirm this appeal of an order denying appellant's objections to a foreclosure sale. The first three issues appellant raises relate to a hearing before the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board which took place in May, 1991, resulting in a fine and a lien. Those alleged errors had to be appealed in 1991 to the circuit court sitting in its appellate capacity. See § 162.11, Fla. Stat. (2001). An appeal now is untimely. The remaining issue was determined in an earlier final judgment of foreclosure which appellant appealed, but the appeal was dismissed because he did not pursue it. We can only review the order denying appellant's objection to the foreclosure sale and find no error. We accordingly affirm.

WARNER, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoyt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Feb 27, 2002
810 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Hoyt v. State

Case Details

Full title:JACK HOYT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Feb 27, 2002

Citations

810 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Pridgen v. First Union Bank

We have no jurisdiction to grant her any relief in that regard. See Beal Bank, S.S.B., Inc. v. Sherwin, 829…