From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoyt v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

April, 1927.


Judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. We think that the letter of January 13, 1922, and the acceptance by plaintiff of the payments made by defendant thereunder, constitute a binding and enforcible agreement, and that the evidence did not show any modification thereof. Kelly, P.J., Young, Kapper, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoyt v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1927
220 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Hoyt v. Hoyt

Case Details

Full title:WILHELMINA E. HOYT, Appellant, v. ALPHEUS W. HOYT, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1927

Citations

220 App. Div. 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)