From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOYT v. C/O MANNING

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 14, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1795 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1795 LKK EFB P.

May 14, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 30, 2006, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint and, on December 5, 2006, this court issued findings and recommendations, recommending dismissal of the action for failure to state a claim. On January 5, 2007, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations, together with an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, the findings and recommendations are vacated.

The amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

Plaintiff has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Manning, Delgado, Richards, Mapes, Silvera, Hallman, Saculla, Hansen, Sherman, Russell, and Isler.

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 11 USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet, and a copy of the amended complaint filed January 5, 2007.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
b. One completed summons;
c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 3 above; and
d. Twelve copies of the endorsed complaint filed January 5, 2007.

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.

5. Plaintiff's April 4, 2007, motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed __________. One completed summons ___ completed USM-285 forms ___ copies of the __________________________ Complaint/Amended Complaint DATED: ______________________________________ Plaintiff


Summaries of

HOYT v. C/O MANNING

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 14, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1795 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 14, 2007)
Case details for

HOYT v. C/O MANNING

Case Details

Full title:JOHNAE R. HOYT, Plaintiff, v. C/O MANNING, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 14, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1795 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 14, 2007)