From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoyos v. Milio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 15, 2022
22 Civ. 1982 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)

Opinion

22 Civ. 1982 (AT)

03-15-2022

Rodolfo Hoyos, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated in the proposed FLSA Collective Action, Plaintiff, v. Filippo Milio, Carmelo Milio, Dominique Milio, 2833 Decatur Avenue LLC, Falco Realty Inc., Trion Real Estate Management LLC, and Trion Holdings LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding, ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hoyos v. Milio

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 15, 2022
22 Civ. 1982 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hoyos v. Milio

Case Details

Full title:Rodolfo Hoyos, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated in the…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

22 Civ. 1982 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 15, 2022)