From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoyle v. Rose Defino-Nastasi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
22 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

22 EM 2024

09-25-2024

KENNETH D. HOYLE, Petitioner v. ROSE DEFINO-NASTASI, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ET AL., Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of September, 2024, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282, 293 (Pa. 2010) (indicating that hybrid representation is improper).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record and to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.


Summaries of

Hoyle v. Rose Defino-Nastasi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 25, 2024
22 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Hoyle v. Rose Defino-Nastasi

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH D. HOYLE, Petitioner v. ROSE DEFINO-NASTASI, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

22 EM 2024 (Pa. Sep. 25, 2024)