From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoyle v. Crozier

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 2024
Civil Action 22-3049 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-3049

10-16-2024

NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE Plaintiff, v. PATRICK A. CROZIER, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

AND NOW, this 16th day of October 2024, upon consideration of the Motions to Strike and Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by Defendants Patrick A. Crozier and James McIntosh, Sean Johnson, and David Tyler, and Plaintiff's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss [Doc. Nos. 50, 52, 53] are GRANTED. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is STRICKEN and DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hoyle v. Crozier

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 16, 2024
Civil Action 22-3049 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Hoyle v. Crozier

Case Details

Full title:NICHOLAS AUSTIN HOYLE Plaintiff, v. PATRICK A. CROZIER, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 16, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 22-3049 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 16, 2024)