From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Jun 21, 1951
200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)

Opinion

06-21-1951

Eliza Howson, Appellant, v. Marlene Blouse Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.


Harold Weiss and Leo Moskowitz for appellant.

William L. Shumate for respondent.

HOFSTADTER, EDER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur.

Per Curiam.

A witness who is present in or just outside the courtroom may be required to testify notwithstanding the fact that he was not served with a subpœna.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Jun 21, 1951
200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)
Case details for

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Eliza Howson, Appellant,v.Marlene Blouse Corp., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

Date published: Jun 21, 1951

Citations

200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)