From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 21, 1951
200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)

Opinion

June 21, 1951.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GENUNG, J.

Harold Weiss and Leo Moskowitz for appellant.

William L. Shumate for respondent.


A witness who is present in or just outside the courtroom may be required to testify notwithstanding the fact that he was not served with a subpoena.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

HOFSTADTER, EDER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jun 21, 1951
200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)
Case details for

Howson v. Marlene Blouse Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ELIZA HOWSON, Appellant, v. MARLENE BLOUSE CORP., Respondent, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jun 21, 1951

Citations

200 Misc. 242 (N.Y. App. Term 1951)
106 N.Y.S.2d 774

Citing Cases

Opinion No. 79180

Ex parte Hall, 90 Okla. 231, 122 P.2d 1005 (1942). See also, Leckie v. Scott, 10 La. 412, and Hawson v.…