Howse v. Maykel

Full title: DENISHO QUINCY HOWSE, Plaintiff, v. J. MAYKEL, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

2:07-cv-0010-GEB-DAD-P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2008)

Opinion

2:07-cv-0010-GEB-DAD-P.

January 22, 2008

ORDER

GARLAND BURRELL JR., District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 3, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 3, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).