From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howeth v. Hudson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Jul 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08cv69 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08cv69.

July 17, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff David Howeth, Jr., a Texas prison inmate, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit alleging that his life was in danger when he was confined at the Telford Unit. The complaint was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction should be denied. The Plaintiff has filed objections.

The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Plaintiff to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of the Plaintiff are without merit. It is accordingly

ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction (docket entry numbers 18 and 19) are DENIED.


Summaries of

Howeth v. Hudson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division
Jul 17, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08cv69 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2008)
Case details for

Howeth v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:DAVID HOWETH, JR., #1174154 v. DAVID L. HUDSON, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Texarkana Division

Date published: Jul 17, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08cv69 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 17, 2008)