From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howells v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02814-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02814-AP

01-23-2012

OLIVER N. HOWELLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Patrick C.H. Spencer, II Spencer & Spencer JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant United States Attorney


JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Patrick C.H. Spencer, II

Spencer & Spencer

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

Debra J. Meachum

Special Assistant United States Attorney

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS

A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 10/27/11
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 11/3/11
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 1/3/12

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the record is complete.

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7. OTHER MATTERS

The parties state that there are no other matters.

8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE

A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: 3/2/12
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 4/2/12
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 4/17/12

9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.

11. OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

BY THE COURT:

John L. Kane

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED:

For Plaintiff:

____________

Patrick C.H. Spencer, II

Spencer & Spencer

For Defendant:

JOHN F. WALSH

United States Attorney

WILLIAM G. PHARO

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office

District of Colorado

____________

Debra J. Meachum

Special Assistant United States Attorney


Summaries of

Howells v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02814-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Howells v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER N. HOWELLS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02814-AP (D. Colo. Jan. 23, 2012)