From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Villarreal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 13, 2021
1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC)

08-13-2021

KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. S. VILLARREAL, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER (ECF NO. 46) ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 20, 2021

Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On August 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed what the Court construes as a motion for a protective order. (ECF No. 46). Plaintiff seeks to have his deposition conducted confidentially. In support of this argument Plaintiff cites California Code of Regulations, Title 15, § 3178(m), which states, “[conversations between an inmate and an attorney and/or attorney representative shall not be listened to or monitored, except for that visual observation by staff which is necessary for the safety and security of the institution/facility.”

Defendant is directed to file a response to this argument no later than August 20, 2021.

Specifically, Defendant should explain what monitoring will be utilized during the deposition and how that monitoring complies with section 3178.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Howell v. Villarreal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 13, 2021
1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Howell v. Villarreal

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. S. VILLARREAL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)