From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Villarreal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC)

07-22-2021

KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. S. VILLARREAL, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM COURT REPORTER PHYSICAL PRESENCE REQUIREMENT UNDER FED. RULE CIV. P. 28 (ECF No. 41)

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Ex Parte Motion for Relief from Court Reporter Physical Presence Requirement Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 28 (ECF No. 41) is GRANTED. The court reporter is not required to be in the same physical location as Plaintiff during Plaintiffs deposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Howell v. Villarreal

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 22, 2021
1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Howell v. Villarreal

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. S. VILLARREAL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 22, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01178-NE-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 22, 2021)