From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 1977
347 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1977)

Opinion

No. 50235.

June 9, 1977.

Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, First District, 337 So.2d 823.

Tom B. Osteen, Perry, for petitioner.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C.J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

ADKINS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Howell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 9, 1977
347 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1977)
Case details for

Howell v. State

Case Details

Full title:TED HOWELL, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 9, 1977

Citations

347 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 1977)