From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Shepard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2536 LEW GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2536 LEW GGH P.

February 27, 2008


ORDER


Examination of this action and the court's records reveals that the petitioner has previously filed a petition for relief in the same matter. (No. CIV S-02-1376 GEB JFM P.) Pursuant to Local Rule 81-190(d), the above-captioned action will be reassigned to the Judge and Magistrate Judge who considered the prior petition.

A court may take judicial notice of court records. See MGIC Indem. Co. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 505 (9th Cir. 1986); United States v. Wilson, 631 F.2d 118, 119 (9th Cir. 1980).

The parties should be aware that reassigning this action under Local Rule 81-190(d) merely has the result that the action is assigned to the Judge and Magistrate Judge who considered the prior petition; no consolidation of the actions is effected.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is reassigned to Judge Burrell and Magistrate Judge Moulds for all further proceedings; henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this action shall be shown as No. CIV S-07-2536 GEB JFM P; and

2. The Clerk of the Court shall make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.


Summaries of

Howell v. Shepard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 27, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2536 LEW GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Howell v. Shepard

Case Details

Full title:PRESTON ALONZO HOWELL, Petitioner, v. M. SHEPARD, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2536 LEW GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2008)