From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Rochester Institute of Technology

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 12, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Stone, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred by denying plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment under Labor Law § 240 (1). The uncontroverted facts in the record reveal that plaintiff Joel J. Howell was injured when he fell approximately 35 feet to the ground from a scaffold on which he was performing masonry work. The evidence established that the scaffold suddenly tipped and fell away at one end. Therefore, because plaintiff Joel Howell fell from an elevated worksite and no safety or protective devices were then in place to give proper protection to him, plaintiffs are entitled to partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action (see, Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co., 78 N.Y.2d 509; Staples v. Town of Amherst, 146 A.D.2d 292). Moreover, the availability of safety devices at the worksite is insufficient to defeat plaintiffs' entitlement to summary judgment because "[a]n owner's statutory duty is not met merely by providing safety instructions or by making other safety devices available, but by furnishing, placing and operating such devices so as to give proper protection" (Gordon v. Eastern Ry. Supply, 181 A.D.2d 990, 991; see also, Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 N.Y.2d 513, 523-524; Heath v. Soloff Constr., 107 A.D.2d 507, 510-512).

In all other respects, the order of Supreme Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Howell v. Rochester Institute of Technology

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 12, 1993
191 A.D.2d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Howell v. Rochester Institute of Technology

Case Details

Full title:JOEL J. HOWELL et al., Appellants, v. ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 1006 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 513

Citing Cases

Szuba v. Marc Equity Properties, Inc.

It is undisputed that the area in which plaintiff was working was not protected by the only safety device…

Madigan v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Contrary to defendants' contention, the fact that the accident was unwitnessed does not require a trial;…