Summary
finding petitioner failed to "identify what counsel should have done differently or explain how the outcome of [petitioner]'s proceedings might have been different if counsel had performed differently."
Summary of this case from Joeckel v. ClineOpinion
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1041-WHA (WO)
03-29-2016
JAMES E. HOWELL, #260 462, Petitioner, v. J. C. GILES, et al., Respondents.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the order of the court entered in this case on this day,
Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Respondents, and against the Petitioner, and this petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
DONE this 29th day of March, 2016.
/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE