From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. City of N.Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Aug 15, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 82660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

M-3 M-6298

08-15-2017

Jay Howell, an Infant, by his Parents and Natural Guardians, James Howell and Carolyn Lane, and James Howell and Carolyn Lane, Individually, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The City of New York and New York City Department of Transportation, Defendants-Appellants.


Appeals having been taken from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about January 24, 2014 and from an order, same Court, entered on or about July 1, 2014, And plaintiffs-respondents having moved for the dismissal of the aforesaid appeals (M-6298), And defendants-appellants having cross-moved for an enlargement of time to perfect the aforesaid appeals (M-3), Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion and cross motion, and the stipulation of the parties herein, received July 11, 2017, and due deliberation having been had thereon, it is Ordered that the motion and cross motion, and defendants-appellants' appeals, are deemed withdrawn in accordance with the aforesaid stipulation.

ENTERED: August 15, 2017

_____________________ CLERK

Present: Hon. Rolando T. Acosta, Presiding Justice, David Friedman Richard T. Andrias Judith J. Gische Barbara R. Kapnick, Justices

Index No. 16006/06


Summaries of

Howell v. City of N.Y.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Aug 15, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 82660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Howell v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Jay Howell, an Infant, by his Parents and Natural Guardians, James Howell…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: Aug 15, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 82660 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)