From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Byrd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-00954-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00954-TLN-EFB

09-27-2021

KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. J. BYRD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 20, 2021, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed August 20, 2021, (ECF No. 13), are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Byrd, Heath, Briggs, Houston, Juarez, Perey, Juarez, Labao, and Stephenson are dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Howell v. Byrd

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-00954-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Howell v. Byrd

Case Details

Full title:KAREEM J. HOWELL, Plaintiff, v. J. BYRD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-00954-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)