From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Boyle

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2013
539 F. App'x 706 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 09-36153 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00727-KI

05-30-2013

JEAN MARIE HOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER DAVID BOYLE and CITY OF BEAVERTON, Defendants - Appellants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Garr M. King, Senior District Judge, Presiding


Argued October 6, 2010

Submitted May 30, 2013

Portland, Oregon

Before: PAEZ and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.

The Honorable Larry A. Burns, District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

In this case, we certified two questions to the Oregon Supreme Court. Howell v. Boyle, 673 F.3d 1054 (9th Cir. 2011). The Oregon Supreme Court granted certification and filed an opinion answering the question it deemed dispositive on March 14, 2013. Howell v. Boyle, 353 Or. 359 (2013). The Oregon Supreme Court denied Plaintiff Howell's Petition for Reconsideration on May 16, 2013, and the matter is now ripe for our decision.

This memorandum disposition resolves both parties' requests for relief filed May 21, 2013.
--------

As the Oregon Supreme Court did, we assume that Howell's claim is protected by the "remedy clause" of Article 1, Section 10 of Oregon's constitution. Applying the Supreme Court's decision that a statutorily capped remedy of $200,000 to Plaintiff Howell would be "constitutionally adequate" because it is "substantial" and does not leave her "wholly without remedy,"we REVERSE the district court's denial of Defendants' Rule 59(e) motion. We REMAND to the district court with instructions to (1) revise the amount of judgment to $200,000, in accordance with the Oregon Tort Claims Act damages cap in former Oregon Revised Statutes § 30.270(1); and (2) remove Officer Boyle as a defendant and substitute the City of Beaverton pursuant to former Oregon Revised Statutes § 30.265(1).

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.


Summaries of

Howell v. Boyle

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2013
539 F. App'x 706 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Howell v. Boyle

Case Details

Full title:JEAN MARIE HOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER DAVID BOYLE and…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 30, 2013

Citations

539 F. App'x 706 (9th Cir. 2013)