From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howell v. Booyer

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 1, 2011
420 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7195.

Submitted: March 17, 2011.

Decided: April 1, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-ct-03043-FL).

David Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Ronnie Monroe Mitchell, Mitchell, Brewer, Richardson, Adams, Burge Boughman, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


David Howell appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. HoweU v. Bovyer, No. 5:09-ct-03043-FL, 2010 WL 3239072 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Howell v. Booyer

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 1, 2011
420 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Howell v. Booyer

Case Details

Full title:David HOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, Officer C.L. BOOYER; Cumberland County…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

420 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2011)