Howarth v. Wozniak

Full title: LESLIE PAUL HOWARTH, Plaintiff v. OFFICE OF JOHN WOZNIAK, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 26, 2005

Civil Action No. 05-43J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 26, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-43J.

September 26, 2005

MEMORANDUM ORDER

GARY LANCASTER, District Judge

This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on September 9, 2005, docket no. 11, recommending that the complaint be dismissed for lack of standing.

The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation; plaintiff was notified that he had the same amount of time to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, no party has filed objections, and the time to do either has expired.

After review of the record of this matter together with the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.