From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howards v. Reichele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-CMA-CBS

09-20-2012

STEVEN HOWARDS Plaintiff, v. VIRGIL D. "GUS" REICHELE, JR., in his individual and official capacity, DANIEL McLAUGHLIN, in his individual and official capacity, DAN DOYLE, in his individual and official capacity, and ADAM DANIELS, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the Order Directing Entry of Judgment in Defendants' Favor by Judge Christine M. Arguello, entered on August 31,2012 it is

ORDERED that FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby ENTERED in favor of Defendants and that this case be DISMISSED.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 20th day of September, 2012.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: __________

Sandra Hartmann

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Howards v. Reichele

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 20, 2012
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Howards v. Reichele

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN HOWARDS Plaintiff, v. VIRGIL D. "GUS" REICHELE, JR., in…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-CMA-CBS (D. Colo. Sep. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Sampson v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan

In so ruling, the court explained that a "right is clearly established if 'every reasonable officer would…

Sampson v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Michigan

In so ruling, the court explained that a "right is clearly established if 'every reasonable officer would…