From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Woods

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 4, 2024
4:24-cv-00529-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-00529-JM

12-04-2024

NORRIS B. HOWARD, SR. ADC #083225 PLAINTIFF v. LAFAYETTE WOODS, JR., et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has received a Recommendation from Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin. After careful review of the Recommendation, Mr. Howard's timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. Although Mr, Howard contends that he has sent partial payment, no payment has been received. Mr. Howard's sixth motion for extension of time, docket #25 is denied.

Mr. Howard's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to: (1) pay the statutory filing fee; and (2) prosecute this case.

The Clerk is instructed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Howard v. Woods

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 4, 2024
4:24-cv-00529-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2024)
Case details for

Howard v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:NORRIS B. HOWARD, SR. ADC #083225 PLAINTIFF v. LAFAYETTE WOODS, JR., et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 4, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-00529-JM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 4, 2024)