From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Village of Chisholm

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 23, 1934
253 N.W. 768 (Minn. 1934)

Opinion

No. 29,801.

March 23, 1934.

Case followed.

Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover for medical expenses incurred and for loss of services to plaintiff arising out of an injury to his minor son. The case was tried before Martin Hughes, Judge, and a jury. Plaintiff recovered a verdict of $33. Defendant appealed from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial. Affirmed, following Howard v. Village of Chisholm, 191 Minn. 245, 253 N.W. 766.

Rosemeier Montague, for appellant.

Frank M. Talus, for respondent.



The damages herein awarded were adequately proved, and hence the order is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion this day filed in Howard v. Village of Chisholm, 191 Minn. 245, 253 N.W. 766.


Summaries of

Howard v. Village of Chisholm

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Mar 23, 1934
253 N.W. 768 (Minn. 1934)
Case details for

Howard v. Village of Chisholm

Case Details

Full title:BEN HOWARD v. VILLAGE OF CHISHOLM

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Mar 23, 1934

Citations

253 N.W. 768 (Minn. 1934)
253 N.W. 768