From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOWARD v. USDC SD OH

U.S.
Mar 21, 2011
562 U.S. 1284 (2011)

Opinion

No. 10–8576.

03-21-2011

Gregory T. HOWARD, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, et al.


Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Justice KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.


Summaries of

HOWARD v. USDC SD OH

U.S.
Mar 21, 2011
562 U.S. 1284 (2011)
Case details for

HOWARD v. USDC SD OH

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY T. HOWARD v. USDC SD OH, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 21, 2011

Citations

562 U.S. 1284 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 1719
179 L. Ed. 2d 612