From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. U.N.C. Health Care System

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 7, 2011
1:10CV47 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2011)

Opinion

1:10CV47.

March 7, 2011


ORDER


The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on September 7, 2010, was served on the parties in this action. Plaintiff filed objections to the Recommendation.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 17] is GRANTED in its entirety and that this action is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to the Court to Order All Evidence for Discovery and Disclosure [Doc. 28] is DENIED for lack of good cause. A Judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

Date: March 7, 2011


Summaries of

Howard v. U.N.C. Health Care System

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Mar 7, 2011
1:10CV47 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Howard v. U.N.C. Health Care System

Case Details

Full title:EMMA VICTORIA HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. U.N.C. HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Mar 7, 2011

Citations

1:10CV47 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2011)

Citing Cases

Watson v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

In her complaint, Watson describes various acts of alleged discrimination beginning in 2010 including: a…

Dove v. United Parcel Serv., Inc.

Regardless, as Defendants note, the time limit runs from the date of termination, not from the date any…