From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 14, 2012
NO. 1-12-0004 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1-12-0004

08-14-2012

ERIC BERNARD HOWARD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, DEPART-MENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 57) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No. 60).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Tennessee Department of Correction, Schofield, Hodge, Rodriguez and Jordan is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against these Defendants are DISMISSED.

Plaintiff's claims against all remaining Defendants are referred back to the Magistrate Judge in accordance with the Court's prior Order. Docket No. 4.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Howard v. Tennessee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION
Aug 14, 2012
NO. 1-12-0004 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Howard v. Tennessee

Case Details

Full title:ERIC BERNARD HOWARD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE, DEPART-MENT OF CORRECTIONS, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

NO. 1-12-0004 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 14, 2012)