From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Stetson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 7, 2013
CASE NO. 1D12-6160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2013)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D12-6160

02-07-2013

DAVID M. HOWARD, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE BRAD STETSON, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY AND/OR OTHER JUDGES OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Respondents.

David M. Howard, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

Petition for writ of prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction. David M. Howard, pro se, Petitioner. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents. PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. WOLF, THOMAS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.

Summaries of

Howard v. Stetson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Feb 7, 2013
CASE NO. 1D12-6160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Howard v. Stetson

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. HOWARD, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE BRAD STETSON, IN AND FOR…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Feb 7, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1D12-6160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2013)