From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Jul 10, 1974
512 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 9573.

July 10, 1974.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, PHELPS COUNTY, WINSTON V. BUFORD, J.

Philip M. Moomaw, Dan L. Birdsong, Rolla, for movant-appellant.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., G. Michael O'Neal, Bill Arnet, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.


Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court denied William Floyd Howard's motion to vacate consecutive sentences imposed February 25, 1971, on his guilty pleas to two felony charges.

Since the submission of this case on appeal the Attorney General has filed with our Clerk official documents attesting to the fact that both sentences have been completed and that appellant was released from custody under the sentences on October 26, 1973.

By reason of appellant's unconditional release from custody under the sentences sought to be vacated, relief under Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R., is not available. Bibbs v. State, 476 S.W.2d 590 (Mo. 1972); Scroggins v. State, 499 S.W.2d 818 (Mo.App. 1973). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

All concur.


Summaries of

Howard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Jul 10, 1974
512 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Howard v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM F. HOWARD, MOVANT-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District

Date published: Jul 10, 1974

Citations

512 S.W.2d 206 (Mo. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Kilbert v. State

Consequently, this appeal is moot. Where a Rule 27.26 motion seeks only to correct a sentence by allowing…

Howard v. Wyrick

After an evidentiary hearing, the Missouri circuit court denied Howard's 27.26 motion. While an appeal was…