From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Savannah College of Art Design, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 11, 1990
387 S.E.2d 332 (Ga. 1990)

Opinion

S89A0433.

DECIDED JANUARY 11, 1990. RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 6, 1990.

Certiorari to the Chatham Superior Court.

Hull, Towill, Norman Barrett, David E. Hudson, James B. Ellington, for appellant.

Ranitz, Mahoney, Forbes Coolidge, Morton G. Forbes, Catherine M. Bowman, Middleton Anderson, Susan E. Shelley, Neely Player, Taylor Tapley Daly, Leigh M. Wilco, for appellees.

Dow, Lohnes Albertson, Terrence B. Adamson, Peter C. Canfield, Carolyn Y. Forrest, amicus curiae.


A newspaper reporter refused to answer certain questions propounded to her during a deposition taken in the course of civil litigation. Her refusal was based upon her assertion of a purported "qualified reporter's privilege."

The trial court held: "Georgia has no statutory qualified reporter's privilege. . . . [She] has no qualified reporter's privilege under the law of this state."

This holding was correct. Vaughn v. State, 259 Ga. 325 ( 381 S.E.2d 30) (1989).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 11, 1990 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 6, 1990.


Summaries of

Howard v. Savannah College of Art Design, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jan 11, 1990
387 S.E.2d 332 (Ga. 1990)
Case details for

Howard v. Savannah College of Art Design, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD v. SAVANNAH COLLEGE OF ART DESIGN, INC. et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jan 11, 1990

Citations

387 S.E.2d 332 (Ga. 1990)
387 S.E.2d 332

Citing Cases

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution v. Jewell

Aside from the constitutional issues, both the Georgia Supreme Court and this Court have consistently held…

In re Paul

259 Ga. 325, 326 ( 381 S.E.2d 30) (1989). 259 Ga. 795, 796 ( 387 S.E.2d 332) (1990). See generally Susan A.…