From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Russo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2018
No. 18-1244 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-1244

05-30-2018

REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD RUSSO; JORDAN GEIBEL; SCOTT HAMILTON, Defendants - Appellees, and JEFFREY FLOYD; KAREN FLOYD; JONATHAN SCHMEDEL, Defendants.

Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan Geibel, Appellee Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:16-cv-03948-GLR) Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Redmond Howard, Appellant Pro Se. Jordan Geibel, Appellee Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Redmond Howard seeks to appeal the district court's order addressing the various motions Howard filed in a pending civil suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Howard seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Howard v. Russo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 30, 2018
No. 18-1244 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Howard v. Russo

Case Details

Full title:REDMOND HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. EDWARD RUSSO; JORDAN GEIBEL…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 30, 2018

Citations

No. 18-1244 (4th Cir. May. 30, 2018)