Opinion
1014 CA 18-02142
06-12-2020
ERNSTROM & DRESTE, LLP, ROCHESTER (MARTHA A. CONNOLLY OF COUNSEL), AND MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. TANG OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH S. NACCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINITFFS-RESPONDENTS.
PRESENT:
ERNSTROM & DRESTE, LLP, ROCHESTER (MARTHA A. CONNOLLY OF COUNSEL), AND MORGENSTERN DEVOESICK PLLC, PITTSFORD, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. TANG OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOSEPH S. NACCA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINITFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered October 18, 2018. The order and judgment, among other things, granted plaintiff William Howard, attorneys' fees and disbursements as against defendant Gary L. Pooler.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and the award of attorneys' fees and disbursements is vacated.
Same memorandum as in Howard v Pooler ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [June 12, 2020] [4th Dept 2020]).
Entered: June 12, 2020
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court