From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Pearl

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2021
CV 20-5880 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

CV 20-5880 MWF (MRW)

12-20-2021

JERMAINE JEVON HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. LUCY PEARL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff's application for in forma pauperis status, the Ninth Circuit's memorandum order, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written objections to the report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (a) Plaintiff's IFP application is GRANTED; and (b) the third cause of action is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, Plaintiff is directed to promptly take steps to effect service of process on the defendants in the action.


Summaries of

Howard v. Pearl

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2021
CV 20-5880 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Howard v. Pearl

Case Details

Full title:JERMAINE JEVON HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. LUCY PEARL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

CV 20-5880 MWF (MRW) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)