From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Octagon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
Case No. C 13 1111 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C 13 1111 PJH

05-10-2013

SEAN HOWARD Plaintiff, v. OCTAGON, INC. Defendant.

DANIELLE OCHS, State Bar No. 178677 KRYSTAL N. LOPILATO, State Bar No. 263320 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Attorneys for Defendant OCTAGON, INC. WALTER M. STELLA, State Bar No. 148215 ADAM J. TULLMAN, State Bar No. 235694 MILLER LAW GROUP Attorneys for Plaintiff SEAN HOWARD


DANIELLE OCHS, State Bar No. 178677
KRYSTAL N. LOPILATO, State Bar No. 263320
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
OCTAGON, INC.
WALTER M. STELLA, State Bar No. 148215
ADAM J. TULLMAN, State Bar No. 235694
MILLER LAW GROUP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEAN HOWARD

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO

RESPOND AND CONTINUING CASE

MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE


Trial Date: None Set

On May 7, 2013, the Parties filed a Stipulation Extending Time to Respond and Continuing Case Management Conference ("Stipulation"). Having considered the Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, it is hereby ordered that the Stipulation is granted as follows:

1. Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint shall be extended until after the date on which Plaintiff files his Second Amended Complaint.

2. Plaintiff may file his Second Amended Complaint by May 31, 2013.

3. The deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (or First Amended Complaint if no Second Amended Complaint is filed), shall be June 19, 2013.

4. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Stay Arbitration shall be June 19, 2013.

5. Oppositions to the motions filed on June 19, 2013 shall be due on July 3, 2013 and replies shall be due on July 10, 2013.

6. The hearing date for any motion filed in response to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint and Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Arbitration shall be July 24, 2013.

7. The Parties agree to stay an arbitration pending before the American Arbitration Association in Virginia until July 26, 2013.

8. The Case Management Conference in this matter shall be continued to Thursday, August 29, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Howard v. Octagon, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 10, 2013
Case No. C 13 1111 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Howard v. Octagon, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEAN HOWARD Plaintiff, v. OCTAGON, INC. Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. C 13 1111 PJH (N.D. Cal. May. 10, 2013)