From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. DHRS, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 1, 1989
541 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-171.

March 14, 1989. Rehearing Denied May 1, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John A. Tanksley, J.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg and Arnold R. Ginsberg, William Huggett, Miami, for appellants.

Colodny, Fass Talenfeld and James M. Fishman, North Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


At least one medical expert rendered a strong opinion, in the record, that the negligence of the health-care facility was a substantial factor contributing to the victim's demise. It cannot be said, consequently, for the purpose of a summary judgment, that the defendant has demonstrated conclusively the nonexistence of a material dispute on the issue of proximate causation. Glotzer v. Moselle, 515 So.2d 375 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Sprague v. Coral Cadillac, Inc., 515 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fleischman v. Perez, 491 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). A trial court may not weigh contradictory depositions or affidavits on matters of fact in entering a summary judgment.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Howard v. DHRS, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 1, 1989
541 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Howard v. DHRS, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE HOWARD, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CAROLYN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 1, 1989

Citations

541 So. 2d 117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Bogorff by Through Bogorff v. Koch

Moore, 475 So.2d at 668. Only in the complete absence of any genuine issue of material fact should summary…