From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1939
4 S.E.2d 616 (N.C. 1939)

Opinion

(Filed 11 October, 1939.)

Appeal and Error § 38 —

When the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendant from Rousseau, J., at February Term, 1939, of McDOWELL.

Morgan Morgan and Paul J. Story for plaintiff, appellee.

Williams Cocke and W. R. Chambers for defendant, appellant.


Civil action for personal injuries and property damage arising out of collision between plaintiff's automobile and defendant's bus.

From verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.


One member of the Court, Winborne, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether reversible error has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, accordant with the usual practice in such cases, and stands as the decision in the instant case, without becoming a precedent. Toxey v. Meggs, ante, 798, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Howard v. Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1939
4 S.E.2d 616 (N.C. 1939)
Case details for

Howard v. Coach Co.

Case Details

Full title:A. W. HOWARD v. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1939

Citations

4 S.E.2d 616 (N.C. 1939)
4 S.E.2d 616

Citing Cases

Whitehurst v. Anderson

The Court, one member not sitting, being evenly divided in opinion as to the correct answer, the judgment of…

Warehouses, Inc., v. Burker Co.

The Court, Schenck, J., not sitting, being evenly divided on the merits of this assignment of error, which…