Howard v. Bjerke

Full title: CLAYTON HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER BJERKE, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon, Eugene Division

Date published: Nov 2, 2010

Civil No. 06-1722-AA (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-1722-AA.

November 2, 2010

ORDER

ANN AIKEN, District Judge

Plaintiff's Motion for extension of time (#255) is denied as moot pursuant to the Order (#266) entered September 14, 2010.

Plaintiff's Motion for order to exceed 5 page limit (#255) is allowed.

Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss defendants Vetter and Coleman (#256) is allowed. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Coleman and Vetter are dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's "Motion to Dismiss in Part `without prejudice'" (against defendant Hannon) (#257) is allowed. Plaintiff's claims against defendant Hannon are dismisses without prejudice to plaintiff's right to pursue those claims in a separate lawsuit. The claims are dismissed from this lawsuit with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED this 2 day of November, 2010.