From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Bailey

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 28, 2023
3:22-cv-00064-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00064-MMD-CSD

02-28-2023

MICHAEL HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE BAILEY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Craig S. Denney United States Magistrate Judge

The court is in receipt of Plaintiff's discovery documents and USB thumb drive (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff is advised that discovery papers and discovery documents are not to be filed unless ordered by the court. LR 26-7. The exception to this rule would be if the discovery is the subject of and is appended to a discovery motion, response or reply.

Therefore, Plaintiff's discovery (ECF No. 51) is STRICKEN from the docket. The Clerk's Office shall also return the USB thumb drive received on February 13, 2023, to Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Howard v. Bailey

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 28, 2023
3:22-cv-00064-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Howard v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE BAILEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 28, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00064-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 28, 2023)