From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. CV 10-5081-JFW(OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 10-5081-JFW(OP)

11-15-2011

JACOB HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. LEE BACA, SHERIFF; MAURICE JUNIOUS, WARDEN; LT. SCOTTS, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS,

CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) approving and adopting this Report and Recommendation; (2) granting Defendant Baca's Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the action as to Defendant Baca without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (3) denying Defendant Junious' Motion to Dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies without prejudice; (4) denying Defendant Junious' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6); (5) dismissing the claim for damages against Defendant Junious in his official capacity with prejudice; and (6) ordering Defendant Junious to file an Answer to the First Amended Complaint within thirty days of the entry of the order adopting this Report and Recommendation.

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER

United States District Judge
Prepared by: HONORABLE OSWALD PARADA
United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Howard v. Baca

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. CV 10-5081-JFW(OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Howard v. Baca

Case Details

Full title:JACOB HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. LEE BACA, SHERIFF; MAURICE JUNIOUS, WARDEN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 10-5081-JFW(OP) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Coleman v. Hodges

nd on a mattress on the floor for five days did not rise to the level of a constitutional violation); O'Leary…