From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Howard v. Allison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jun 20, 2011
EDCV 10-579 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)

Opinion


DARRELL WAYNE HOWARD, Petitioner, v. KATHY ALLISON, WARDEN, Respondent. No. EDCV 10-579 AHM (FFM) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. June 20, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Howard v. Allison

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Jun 20, 2011
EDCV 10-579 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Howard v. Allison

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL WAYNE HOWARD, Petitioner, v. KATHY ALLISON, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jun 20, 2011

Citations

EDCV 10-579 AHM (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2011)