From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hovis v. Asture

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-171 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-171 Erie.

September 18, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's social security complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on July 10, 2007, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13], filed on September 2, 2008, recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9] be granted, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] be denied, and that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 9] is GRANTED, and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is DENIED; the case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 13] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on September 2, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Hovis v. Asture

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-171 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Hovis v. Asture

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY L. HOVIS, JR., Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTURE, Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 18, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-171 Erie (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2008)